Introduction to gpsurya blog

$Dear$ $Friends,$ In this blog you will find around 320 solved Geophysics GATE and CSIR-NET and other competitive exams solutions with a better explanation. Please follow and share if you like it. $Thanks,$ $gpsurya$ and $group$

CSIR-NET JUNE 2019

5 comments

 CSIR-NET JUNE 2019

A 1km thick elevated land mass of density 2.7 gm/cc is associated with a free anomaly which is half the Bouguer anomaly. If the density contrast at the crust mantle boundry is 0.3 gm/cc what would be the thickness of the root?

 

(Thank you so much Pawan Singh, BHU)

Solution:

Bouguer anomaly:

$\triangle g_{BA}=g_{m}+(\triangle g_{FC }-\triangle g_{BC}+ \triangle g_{T} +\triangle g_{tide})-g_{n}$-----------(1)

Free air anomaly:

$\triangle g_{FA}=g_{m}+(\triangle g_{FC}+\triangle g_{T}+\triangle g_{Tide})-g_{n}$---------(2)

$equation \left(2-1\right)$

$\triangle g_{FA}-\triangle g_{BA}=\triangle g_{BC}$

$\triangle g_{FA}=\triangle g_{BC}+\triangle g_{BA}----(3)$

$\triangle g_{FA}$---Free air anomaly

$\triangle g_{BA}$----Bouguer anomaly

$\triangle g_{BC}$----Bouguer correction

From above solution

              $\triangle g_{FA}=\frac{1}{2}\triangle g_{BA}---4$

             $ \triangle g_{BA}=2 \triangle g_{FA} $

             Substitute equation 4 in equation 3

$ \frac{1}{2}\triangle g_{BA}=\triangle g_{BC}+\triangle g_{BA}$


$-\frac{1}{2}\triangle g_{BA}=\triangle g_{BC} $


$ -\frac{1}{2}\triangle g_{BA}=2\pi G\triangle\rho t$


$ \triangle g_{BA}=-2(2\pi G\triangle \rho t)$


$\triangle \rho=2700 \frac{kg}{m^{3}}$,thickness =1000m


$ \triangle g_{BA}=-2(0.0419*10^{-3}*2700*1000)$

                         $ =-2(113.13)$

       $\triangle g_{BA}=226.26mgal$

Bouguer anomaly indicating directly root zone. After making the free air and bouguer plate corrections there remains a bouguer anomaly due to block that represents the root zone of a mountain range.

Let the thickness of the root zone is


      $ \triangle g_{BA} =2\pi G\triangle \rho t$


       $226.26=2\pi G(300)*t$


       $226.26=0.0419*10^{-3}(300)*t$


       $\frac{226.26}{0.0419*10^{-3}*300}=t$


       t=18000m


       t=18km.

Related Posts

There is no other posts in this category.

5 comments

  1. A three component seismometer was installed at a granite site. The thickness of rock layer is 15
    km. An earthquake occurred at a depth of 10 km with an epicentral distance of 30 km. The
    observed seismic moment is 6 x 10^27. Which one of the following is the correct relationship
    among body-wave magnitude (mb), surface-wave magnitude (Ms) and moment magnitude (Mw)?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Generally the relation between body-wave magnitude, surface-wave magnitude and moment magnitude is Mw > Ms > mb .


      Delete
  2. In Lowrie there is relation between mb and Ms as- mb= 0.56Ms+2.9 , this shows mb>Ms

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. First of all very nice question. In general scenario mb (body wave magnitude) estimated from a high frequency (1 Hz) phase and Ms (Surface wave magnitude) estimated from a low frequency (0.05Hz) vibrations. Because of this, body wave estimates at around mb=6 (all larger earthquakes give the same body wave magnitude). Similarly,
      Surface wave estimates of magnitude saturate at Ms=8.
      Thus for very large earthquakes, Ms and mb underestimate the energy released.
      Mw (Moment magnitude) is more appropriate for describing the magnitudes of very large earthquakes.

      Based on above information I told the relation Mw>Ms>mb


      (Reference :Fundamentals of Geophysics- William Lowrie )

      Delete
  3. In the above gravity numerical. Why should we take 300 kg/M3 density instead taking the density of crust i.e given in the question. As we know that the root is a part of crust not mantle so we may take 2700 as density instead of the differential density. Please explain this

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Subscribe Our Newsletter