CSIR-NET JUNE 2019
A 1km thick elevated land mass of density 2.7 gm/cc is associated with a
free anomaly which is half the Bouguer anomaly. If the density contrast at the
crust mantle boundry is 0.3 gm/cc what would be the thickness of the root?
(Thank you so much Pawan Singh, BHU)
Solution:
Bouguer anomaly:
$\triangle
g_{BA}=g_{m}+(\triangle g_{FC }-\triangle g_{BC}+ \triangle g_{T} +\triangle
g_{tide})-g_{n}$-----------(1)
Free air anomaly:
$\triangle
g_{FA}=g_{m}+(\triangle g_{FC}+\triangle g_{T}+\triangle
g_{Tide})-g_{n}$---------(2)
$equation
\left(2-1\right)$
$\triangle
g_{FA}-\triangle g_{BA}=\triangle g_{BC}$
$\triangle
g_{FA}=\triangle g_{BC}+\triangle g_{BA}----(3)$
$\triangle g_{FA}$---Free
air anomaly
$\triangle
g_{BA}$----Bouguer anomaly
$\triangle
g_{BC}$----Bouguer correction
From above solution
$\triangle g_{FA}=\frac{1}{2}\triangle
g_{BA}---4$
$ \triangle g_{BA}=2 \triangle
g_{FA} $
Substitute equation 4 in equation
3
$ \frac{1}{2}\triangle g_{BA}=\triangle g_{BC}+\triangle g_{BA}$
$-\frac{1}{2}\triangle g_{BA}=\triangle g_{BC} $
$ -\frac{1}{2}\triangle g_{BA}=2\pi G\triangle\rho t$
$ \triangle g_{BA}=-2(2\pi G\triangle \rho t)$
$\triangle \rho=2700 \frac{kg}{m^{3}}$,thickness =1000m
$ \triangle
g_{BA}=-2(0.0419*10^{-3}*2700*1000)$
$ =-2(113.13)$
$\triangle g_{BA}=226.26mgal$
Bouguer anomaly indicating directly root
zone. After making the free air and bouguer plate corrections there remains a
bouguer anomaly due to block that represents the root zone of a mountain range.
Let the thickness of the root zone is
$ \triangle g_{BA} =2\pi G\triangle \rho
t$
$226.26=2\pi G(300)*t$
$226.26=0.0419*10^{-3}(300)*t$
$\frac{226.26}{0.0419*10^{-3}*300}=t$
t=18000m
t=18km.
A three component seismometer was installed at a granite site. The thickness of rock layer is 15
ReplyDeletekm. An earthquake occurred at a depth of 10 km with an epicentral distance of 30 km. The
observed seismic moment is 6 x 10^27. Which one of the following is the correct relationship
among body-wave magnitude (mb), surface-wave magnitude (Ms) and moment magnitude (Mw)?
Generally the relation between body-wave magnitude, surface-wave magnitude and moment magnitude is Mw > Ms > mb .
DeleteIn Lowrie there is relation between mb and Ms as- mb= 0.56Ms+2.9 , this shows mb>Ms
ReplyDeleteFirst of all very nice question. In general scenario mb (body wave magnitude) estimated from a high frequency (1 Hz) phase and Ms (Surface wave magnitude) estimated from a low frequency (0.05Hz) vibrations. Because of this, body wave estimates at around mb=6 (all larger earthquakes give the same body wave magnitude). Similarly,
DeleteSurface wave estimates of magnitude saturate at Ms=8.
Thus for very large earthquakes, Ms and mb underestimate the energy released.
Mw (Moment magnitude) is more appropriate for describing the magnitudes of very large earthquakes.
Based on above information I told the relation Mw>Ms>mb
(Reference :Fundamentals of Geophysics- William Lowrie )
In the above gravity numerical. Why should we take 300 kg/M3 density instead taking the density of crust i.e given in the question. As we know that the root is a part of crust not mantle so we may take 2700 as density instead of the differential density. Please explain this
ReplyDelete